I like having things arranged in reverse-chronological -- because that way I can most readily see what is new (and with lists longer than about five I have really bad luck finding the new titles. And marking 'new' isn't sufficient either because how do you know when I last came through!? Well 'I' in the generic sense.). If you really must do alphabetical, then pleasepleasplease put a 'posted on' date?
As with most things ficcish, I find having information useful. winkingstar said: Then I have the pairing, rating, word count, and summary. Yeah, that is my minimum... I just re-did my master post the other day: http://fish-echo.dreamwidth.org/24830.html (well, by 'I' I mean, hl on DW actually did the coding and let me babble at her about what I was thinking) and currently I'm really happy with it.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-19 03:20 am (UTC)As with most things ficcish, I find having information useful. winkingstar said: Then I have the pairing, rating, word count, and summary.
Yeah, that is my minimum... I just re-did my master post the other day: http://fish-echo.dreamwidth.org/24830.html (well, by 'I' I mean, hl on DW actually did the coding and let me babble at her about what I was thinking) and currently I'm really happy with it.